Use submerged and exposed parts to find bar length
4.NF.B.3
Generated variants — 10
A pole is pushed straight down until it touches the bottom of a pond and then pulled back out. The wet part of the pole measures m. The pole is then turned upside down and again pushed straight down to the bottom of the pond and pulled out. This time the part that has now been wet twice measures m. Find the length of the pole.
(The pole is always inserted vertically, and the bottom of the pond is flat.)
Show solution
1 · Understandwhat's really being asked
A pole is dipped to the pond bottom from one end, wetting 4/7 m. Flipped and dipped from the other end, the part now wet twice (the overlap of the two wet regions) measures 3/7 m. I must find the pole's full length.
Givens
- Dipping from one end wets a 4/7 m length (equal to the water depth).
- After flipping and dipping from the other end, the part wet twice is 3/7 m.
- The pole is inserted vertically and the bottom is flat, so each dip wets the same depth, 4/7 m.
Unknowns
- The total length of the pole.
Constraints
- Each dip wets a length equal to the water depth, 4/7 m, measured from whichever end goes in.
- The two wet regions overlap in the middle by 3/7 m.
2 · Planchoose the strategy
#1 Draw a Diagram
Draw the pole as a segment with a 4/7 wet region from each end. The two regions overlap by 3/7. Length = (left wet) + (right wet) - (overlap), the classic overlap subtraction.
3 · Execute3 carry out the plan
1Each dip wets 4/7 m
2The overlap is the part wet twice
3Combine with overlap subtraction
4 · Reviewdoes it hold up?
The pole length 5/7 m must be longer than the wet depth 4/7 (true) but shorter than two full dips 8/7 (true), and the overlap 3/7 must be less than the depth 4/7 (true). Everything is consistent in 7ths of a meter.
Standardsmin grade 4
4.OA.A.3Solve multi-step word problems using four operations with whole numbers — Modeling the two dips and setting up the overlap-subtraction relationship.4.NF.B.3Understand a fraction with numerator greater than one as sum of unit fractions — Adding and subtracting the like-denominator 7ths to get 5/7 m.
A pole is pushed straight down until it touches the bottom of a pond and then pulled back out. The wet part of the pole measures m. The pole is then turned upside down and again pushed straight down to the bottom of the pond and pulled out. This time the part that has now been wet twice measures m. Find the length of the pole.
(The pole is always inserted vertically, and the bottom of the pond is flat.)
Show solution
1 · Understandwhat's really being asked
A pole is dipped to the pond bottom from one end, wetting 5/7 m. Flipped and dipped from the other end, the part now wet twice (the overlap of the two wet regions) measures 2/7 m. I must find the pole's full length.
Givens
- Dipping from one end wets a 5/7 m length (equal to the water depth).
- After flipping and dipping from the other end, the part wet twice is 2/7 m.
- The pole is inserted vertically and the bottom is flat, so each dip wets the same depth, 5/7 m.
Unknowns
- The total length of the pole.
Constraints
- Each dip wets a length equal to the water depth, 5/7 m, measured from whichever end goes in.
- The two wet regions overlap in the middle by 2/7 m.
2 · Planchoose the strategy
#1 Draw a Diagram
Draw the pole as a segment with a 5/7 wet region from each end. The two regions overlap by 2/7. Length = (left wet) + (right wet) - (overlap), the classic overlap subtraction.
3 · Execute3 carry out the plan
1Each dip wets 5/7 m
2The overlap is the part wet twice
3Combine with overlap subtraction
4 · Reviewdoes it hold up?
The pole length 8/7 m must be longer than the wet depth 5/7 (true) but shorter than two full dips 10/7 (true), and the overlap 2/7 must be less than the depth 5/7 (true). Everything is consistent in 7ths of a meter.
Standardsmin grade 4
4.OA.A.3Solve multi-step word problems using four operations with whole numbers — Modeling the two dips and setting up the overlap-subtraction relationship.4.NF.B.3Understand a fraction with numerator greater than one as sum of unit fractions — Adding and subtracting the like-denominator 7ths to get 8/7 m.
A pole is pushed straight down until it touches the bottom of a pond and then pulled back out. The wet part of the pole measures m. The pole is then turned upside down and again pushed straight down to the bottom of the pond and pulled out. This time the part that has now been wet twice measures m. Find the length of the pole.
(The pole is always inserted vertically, and the bottom of the pond is flat.)
Show solution
1 · Understandwhat's really being asked
A pole is dipped to the pond bottom from one end, wetting 5/8 m. Flipped and dipped from the other end, the part now wet twice (the overlap of the two wet regions) measures 3/8 m. I must find the pole's full length.
Givens
- Dipping from one end wets a 5/8 m length (equal to the water depth).
- After flipping and dipping from the other end, the part wet twice is 3/8 m.
- The pole is inserted vertically and the bottom is flat, so each dip wets the same depth, 5/8 m.
Unknowns
- The total length of the pole.
Constraints
- Each dip wets a length equal to the water depth, 5/8 m, measured from whichever end goes in.
- The two wet regions overlap in the middle by 3/8 m.
2 · Planchoose the strategy
#1 Draw a Diagram
Draw the pole as a segment with a 5/8 wet region from each end. The two regions overlap by 3/8. Length = (left wet) + (right wet) - (overlap), the classic overlap subtraction.
3 · Execute3 carry out the plan
1Each dip wets 5/8 m
2The overlap is the part wet twice
3Combine with overlap subtraction
4 · Reviewdoes it hold up?
The pole length 7/8 m must be longer than the wet depth 5/8 (true) but shorter than two full dips 10/8 (true), and the overlap 3/8 must be less than the depth 5/8 (true). Everything is consistent in 8ths of a meter.
Standardsmin grade 4
4.OA.A.3Solve multi-step word problems using four operations with whole numbers — Modeling the two dips and setting up the overlap-subtraction relationship.4.NF.B.3Understand a fraction with numerator greater than one as sum of unit fractions — Adding and subtracting the like-denominator 8ths to get 7/8 m.
A pole is pushed straight down until it touches the bottom of a pond and then pulled back out. The wet part of the pole measures m. The pole is then turned upside down and again pushed straight down to the bottom of the pond and pulled out. This time the part that has now been wet twice measures m. Find the length of the pole.
(The pole is always inserted vertically, and the bottom of the pond is flat.)
Show solution
1 · Understandwhat's really being asked
A pole is dipped to the pond bottom from one end, wetting 6/9 m. Flipped and dipped from the other end, the part now wet twice (the overlap of the two wet regions) measures 4/9 m. I must find the pole's full length.
Givens
- Dipping from one end wets a 6/9 m length (equal to the water depth).
- After flipping and dipping from the other end, the part wet twice is 4/9 m.
- The pole is inserted vertically and the bottom is flat, so each dip wets the same depth, 6/9 m.
Unknowns
- The total length of the pole.
Constraints
- Each dip wets a length equal to the water depth, 6/9 m, measured from whichever end goes in.
- The two wet regions overlap in the middle by 4/9 m.
2 · Planchoose the strategy
#1 Draw a Diagram
Draw the pole as a segment with a 6/9 wet region from each end. The two regions overlap by 4/9. Length = (left wet) + (right wet) - (overlap), the classic overlap subtraction.
3 · Execute3 carry out the plan
1Each dip wets 6/9 m
2The overlap is the part wet twice
3Combine with overlap subtraction
4 · Reviewdoes it hold up?
The pole length 8/9 m must be longer than the wet depth 6/9 (true) but shorter than two full dips 12/9 (true), and the overlap 4/9 must be less than the depth 6/9 (true). Everything is consistent in 9ths of a meter.
Standardsmin grade 4
4.OA.A.3Solve multi-step word problems using four operations with whole numbers — Modeling the two dips and setting up the overlap-subtraction relationship.4.NF.B.3Understand a fraction with numerator greater than one as sum of unit fractions — Adding and subtracting the like-denominator 9ths to get 8/9 m.
A pole is pushed straight down until it touches the bottom of a pond and then pulled back out. The wet part of the pole measures m. The pole is then turned upside down and again pushed straight down to the bottom of the pond and pulled out. This time the part that has now been wet twice measures m. Find the length of the pole.
(The pole is always inserted vertically, and the bottom of the pond is flat.)
Show solution
1 · Understandwhat's really being asked
A pole is dipped to the pond bottom from one end, wetting 5/9 m. Flipped and dipped from the other end, the part now wet twice (the overlap of the two wet regions) measures 4/9 m. I must find the pole's full length.
Givens
- Dipping from one end wets a 5/9 m length (equal to the water depth).
- After flipping and dipping from the other end, the part wet twice is 4/9 m.
- The pole is inserted vertically and the bottom is flat, so each dip wets the same depth, 5/9 m.
Unknowns
- The total length of the pole.
Constraints
- Each dip wets a length equal to the water depth, 5/9 m, measured from whichever end goes in.
- The two wet regions overlap in the middle by 4/9 m.
2 · Planchoose the strategy
#1 Draw a Diagram
Draw the pole as a segment with a 5/9 wet region from each end. The two regions overlap by 4/9. Length = (left wet) + (right wet) - (overlap), the classic overlap subtraction.
3 · Execute3 carry out the plan
1Each dip wets 5/9 m
2The overlap is the part wet twice
3Combine with overlap subtraction
4 · Reviewdoes it hold up?
The pole length 6/9 m must be longer than the wet depth 5/9 (true) but shorter than two full dips 10/9 (true), and the overlap 4/9 must be less than the depth 5/9 (true). Everything is consistent in 9ths of a meter.
Standardsmin grade 4
4.OA.A.3Solve multi-step word problems using four operations with whole numbers — Modeling the two dips and setting up the overlap-subtraction relationship.4.NF.B.3Understand a fraction with numerator greater than one as sum of unit fractions — Adding and subtracting the like-denominator 9ths to get 6/9 m.
A pole is pushed straight down until it touches the bottom of a pond and then pulled back out. The wet part of the pole measures m. The pole is then turned upside down and again pushed straight down to the bottom of the pond and pulled out. This time the part that has now been wet twice measures m. Find the length of the pole.
(The pole is always inserted vertically, and the bottom of the pond is flat.)
Show solution
1 · Understandwhat's really being asked
A pole is dipped to the pond bottom from one end, wetting 6/10 m. Flipped and dipped from the other end, the part now wet twice (the overlap of the two wet regions) measures 4/10 m. I must find the pole's full length.
Givens
- Dipping from one end wets a 6/10 m length (equal to the water depth).
- After flipping and dipping from the other end, the part wet twice is 4/10 m.
- The pole is inserted vertically and the bottom is flat, so each dip wets the same depth, 6/10 m.
Unknowns
- The total length of the pole.
Constraints
- Each dip wets a length equal to the water depth, 6/10 m, measured from whichever end goes in.
- The two wet regions overlap in the middle by 4/10 m.
2 · Planchoose the strategy
#1 Draw a Diagram
Draw the pole as a segment with a 6/10 wet region from each end. The two regions overlap by 4/10. Length = (left wet) + (right wet) - (overlap), the classic overlap subtraction.
3 · Execute3 carry out the plan
1Each dip wets 6/10 m
2The overlap is the part wet twice
3Combine with overlap subtraction
4 · Reviewdoes it hold up?
The pole length 8/10 m must be longer than the wet depth 6/10 (true) but shorter than two full dips 12/10 (true), and the overlap 4/10 must be less than the depth 6/10 (true). Everything is consistent in 10ths of a meter.
Standardsmin grade 4
4.OA.A.3Solve multi-step word problems using four operations with whole numbers — Modeling the two dips and setting up the overlap-subtraction relationship.4.NF.B.3Understand a fraction with numerator greater than one as sum of unit fractions — Adding and subtracting the like-denominator 10ths to get 8/10 m.
A pole is pushed straight down until it touches the bottom of a pond and then pulled back out. The wet part of the pole measures m. The pole is then turned upside down and again pushed straight down to the bottom of the pond and pulled out. This time the part that has now been wet twice measures m. Find the length of the pole.
(The pole is always inserted vertically, and the bottom of the pond is flat.)
Show solution
1 · Understandwhat's really being asked
A pole is dipped to the pond bottom from one end, wetting 6/11 m. Flipped and dipped from the other end, the part now wet twice (the overlap of the two wet regions) measures 5/11 m. I must find the pole's full length.
Givens
- Dipping from one end wets a 6/11 m length (equal to the water depth).
- After flipping and dipping from the other end, the part wet twice is 5/11 m.
- The pole is inserted vertically and the bottom is flat, so each dip wets the same depth, 6/11 m.
Unknowns
- The total length of the pole.
Constraints
- Each dip wets a length equal to the water depth, 6/11 m, measured from whichever end goes in.
- The two wet regions overlap in the middle by 5/11 m.
2 · Planchoose the strategy
#1 Draw a Diagram
Draw the pole as a segment with a 6/11 wet region from each end. The two regions overlap by 5/11. Length = (left wet) + (right wet) - (overlap), the classic overlap subtraction.
3 · Execute3 carry out the plan
1Each dip wets 6/11 m
2The overlap is the part wet twice
3Combine with overlap subtraction
4 · Reviewdoes it hold up?
The pole length 7/11 m must be longer than the wet depth 6/11 (true) but shorter than two full dips 12/11 (true), and the overlap 5/11 must be less than the depth 6/11 (true). Everything is consistent in 11ths of a meter.
Standardsmin grade 4
4.OA.A.3Solve multi-step word problems using four operations with whole numbers — Modeling the two dips and setting up the overlap-subtraction relationship.4.NF.B.3Understand a fraction with numerator greater than one as sum of unit fractions — Adding and subtracting the like-denominator 11ths to get 7/11 m.
A pole is pushed straight down until it touches the bottom of a pond and then pulled back out. The wet part of the pole measures m. The pole is then turned upside down and again pushed straight down to the bottom of the pond and pulled out. This time the part that has now been wet twice measures m. Find the length of the pole.
(The pole is always inserted vertically, and the bottom of the pond is flat.)
Show solution
1 · Understandwhat's really being asked
A pole is dipped to the pond bottom from one end, wetting 7/12 m. Flipped and dipped from the other end, the part now wet twice (the overlap of the two wet regions) measures 5/12 m. I must find the pole's full length.
Givens
- Dipping from one end wets a 7/12 m length (equal to the water depth).
- After flipping and dipping from the other end, the part wet twice is 5/12 m.
- The pole is inserted vertically and the bottom is flat, so each dip wets the same depth, 7/12 m.
Unknowns
- The total length of the pole.
Constraints
- Each dip wets a length equal to the water depth, 7/12 m, measured from whichever end goes in.
- The two wet regions overlap in the middle by 5/12 m.
2 · Planchoose the strategy
#1 Draw a Diagram
Draw the pole as a segment with a 7/12 wet region from each end. The two regions overlap by 5/12. Length = (left wet) + (right wet) - (overlap), the classic overlap subtraction.
3 · Execute3 carry out the plan
1Each dip wets 7/12 m
2The overlap is the part wet twice
3Combine with overlap subtraction
4 · Reviewdoes it hold up?
The pole length 9/12 m must be longer than the wet depth 7/12 (true) but shorter than two full dips 14/12 (true), and the overlap 5/12 must be less than the depth 7/12 (true). Everything is consistent in 12ths of a meter.
Standardsmin grade 4
4.OA.A.3Solve multi-step word problems using four operations with whole numbers — Modeling the two dips and setting up the overlap-subtraction relationship.4.NF.B.3Understand a fraction with numerator greater than one as sum of unit fractions — Adding and subtracting the like-denominator 12ths to get 9/12 m.
A pole is pushed straight down until it touches the bottom of a pond and then pulled back out. The wet part of the pole measures m. The pole is then turned upside down and again pushed straight down to the bottom of the pond and pulled out. This time the part that has now been wet twice measures m. Find the length of the pole.
(The pole is always inserted vertically, and the bottom of the pond is flat.)
Show solution
1 · Understandwhat's really being asked
A pole is dipped to the pond bottom from one end, wetting 7/13 m. Flipped and dipped from the other end, the part now wet twice (the overlap of the two wet regions) measures 6/13 m. I must find the pole's full length.
Givens
- Dipping from one end wets a 7/13 m length (equal to the water depth).
- After flipping and dipping from the other end, the part wet twice is 6/13 m.
- The pole is inserted vertically and the bottom is flat, so each dip wets the same depth, 7/13 m.
Unknowns
- The total length of the pole.
Constraints
- Each dip wets a length equal to the water depth, 7/13 m, measured from whichever end goes in.
- The two wet regions overlap in the middle by 6/13 m.
2 · Planchoose the strategy
#1 Draw a Diagram
Draw the pole as a segment with a 7/13 wet region from each end. The two regions overlap by 6/13. Length = (left wet) + (right wet) - (overlap), the classic overlap subtraction.
3 · Execute3 carry out the plan
1Each dip wets 7/13 m
2The overlap is the part wet twice
3Combine with overlap subtraction
4 · Reviewdoes it hold up?
The pole length 8/13 m must be longer than the wet depth 7/13 (true) but shorter than two full dips 14/13 (true), and the overlap 6/13 must be less than the depth 7/13 (true). Everything is consistent in 13ths of a meter.
Standardsmin grade 4
4.OA.A.3Solve multi-step word problems using four operations with whole numbers — Modeling the two dips and setting up the overlap-subtraction relationship.4.NF.B.3Understand a fraction with numerator greater than one as sum of unit fractions — Adding and subtracting the like-denominator 13ths to get 8/13 m.
A pole is pushed straight down until it touches the bottom of a pond and then pulled back out. The wet part of the pole measures m. The pole is then turned upside down and again pushed straight down to the bottom of the pond and pulled out. This time the part that has now been wet twice measures m. Find the length of the pole.
(The pole is always inserted vertically, and the bottom of the pond is flat.)
Show solution
1 · Understandwhat's really being asked
A pole is dipped to the pond bottom from one end, wetting 8/15 m. Flipped and dipped from the other end, the part now wet twice (the overlap of the two wet regions) measures 7/15 m. I must find the pole's full length.
Givens
- Dipping from one end wets a 8/15 m length (equal to the water depth).
- After flipping and dipping from the other end, the part wet twice is 7/15 m.
- The pole is inserted vertically and the bottom is flat, so each dip wets the same depth, 8/15 m.
Unknowns
- The total length of the pole.
Constraints
- Each dip wets a length equal to the water depth, 8/15 m, measured from whichever end goes in.
- The two wet regions overlap in the middle by 7/15 m.
2 · Planchoose the strategy
#1 Draw a Diagram
Draw the pole as a segment with a 8/15 wet region from each end. The two regions overlap by 7/15. Length = (left wet) + (right wet) - (overlap), the classic overlap subtraction.
3 · Execute3 carry out the plan
1Each dip wets 8/15 m
2The overlap is the part wet twice
3Combine with overlap subtraction
4 · Reviewdoes it hold up?
The pole length 9/15 m must be longer than the wet depth 8/15 (true) but shorter than two full dips 16/15 (true), and the overlap 7/15 must be less than the depth 8/15 (true). Everything is consistent in 15ths of a meter.
Standardsmin grade 4
4.OA.A.3Solve multi-step word problems using four operations with whole numbers — Modeling the two dips and setting up the overlap-subtraction relationship.4.NF.B.3Understand a fraction with numerator greater than one as sum of unit fractions — Adding and subtracting the like-denominator 15ths to get 9/15 m.