Depth · one concept from first principles · step 2 of 4
Undo Mia's decimal
Only the 3 repeats: subtract the non-repeating 58 from 583 and divide by 900 (one 9, two 0s).
Mia's misread fraction was in lowest terms, so 7/12 is exactly what she read, and its numerator 7 is the true numerator.
8.NS.A.1Work Backwards.
Why?
Calling the number , and end in the same lined-up tail of s, so subtracting them cancels the tail and leaves .
Why?
Each factor of moves every digit one place to the left, so carries the two digits and in front of the point and carries one more, .
Why?
In the two digits before the repeat have moved out, leaving only s after the point, and is shifted by exactly one more block of length , so its tail matches digit for digit.
Why?
Taking away from and away from keeps the two sides equal, and the matching tails cancel, leaving .
Why?
becomes by dividing top and bottom by , which only renames the fraction.
Undo Liam's decimal
In only the 1 repeats, so use 90 as the denominator.
73 is prime, so 73/90 is in lowest terms and is exactly what Liam read; its denominator 90 is the true denominator.
8.NS.A.1Work BackwardsRebuild the fraction and convert
Put the correct numerator over the correct denominator. 7/90 is in lowest terms, and dividing gives 0.0777….
Only the 7 repeats, starting at the second decimal place.
7.NS.A.2Identify SubproblemsA wrong answer still hides a right part -- work backwards to find it.
- Undo Mia's decimal
- Undo Liam's decimal
- Rebuild the fraction and convert
A parent dashboard for the family lives at sensimlab.com.
The same shape shows up later on the AMC, as Arithmetic Expression Decomposition, Branching State Enumeration, Multiplicative Ratio with Integrality Constraints. Why the shapes repeat →