Problem
Estimate the boundary digit
Round 29 up to 30. Since 30 times 7 = 210 is just over 208, the answer is near 7, so check 7 and the digits above it.
Rounding 29 to 30 gives a quick size estimate of the product without exact multiplying.
3.NBT.A.3Guess And CheckCheck digit 7 exactly
Compute 29 times 7 to test the boundary precisely: 29 × 7 = 203, which is not greater than 208.
203 is less than 208, so 7 does not make the statement true.
3.OA.D.8Guess And CheckCheck digit 8 exactly
Compute 29 times 8 to see whether the next digit works: 29 × 8 = 232, which is greater than 208.
232 is greater than 208, so 8 works; any digit bigger than 8 gives an even larger product.
3.OA.D.8Guess And CheckCount the digits that work
The product grows as the box grows, so every digit from 8 up works and 7 or below fails. Digits 8 and 9 work — 2 in all.
Once the inequality first holds, it keeps holding for all larger digits, so I only count from the boundary up.
3.OA.D.8Look For A PatternAmong the digits 0 through 9, exactly two of them, 8 and 9, make 29 times the box greater than 208, so the count is 2.
Why?
Each time the box goes up by one, 29 times the box climbs by another 29, so once a digit clears 208 every larger digit clears it too, and every smaller digit stays short.
Why?
The jump happens right between 7 and 8: seven copies of 29 reach only 203, still under 208, but eight copies reach 232, above 208, so 8 is the smallest digit that works.
Why?
Treating 29 as 30 minus 1 makes the products easy: eight of them is 240 minus 8, which is 232, and seven of them is 210 minus 7, which is 203.
Why?
232 counts as more than 208 while 203 counts as less, which you settle by lining the numbers up and comparing them one place at a time from the highest place down.
Round 29 to 30 to guess the cutoff, then check around it: Grade 3 estimation does the job!
- Estimate the boundary digit
- Check digit 7 exactly
- Check digit 8 exactly
- Count the digits that work